The second answer relates to "how" organic farmers approach the
philosophical and practical requirements of nutrient and energy
cycling. One obvious means is by crop choice. For example, organic
livestock farmers (in Ontario at least) rely heavily on small grains
(7" rows, rapid attainment of full cover, potential for winter- as
well as spring/summer-groundcover) for their carbohydrate
requirements. There is ample evidence in the literature on the much
greater potential for erosion under wide-row crops, such as corn, as
compared to narrow row cereal crops. Another means of avoiding
erosion is by sustaining groundcover for as many months of the year
as possible. Organic farmers routinely strive for winter cover,
whether as a winter cereal or a plowdown red clover crop or a
winter-dead catch crop such as oilseed radish.
Both of these issues could be quantitated by doing or finding
existing surveys on organic farming methods in your area to create a
composite picture of crop type (% of land under various crops, for
each system), then digging out the ample conventional lit on erosion
with crop type and winter cover to create an aggregate index of
potential soil erosion under organic vs. conventional approaches to
agriculture. Good luck. Ann
ACLARK@crop.uoguelph.ca
Dr. E. Ann Clark
Associate Professor
Crop Science
University of Guelph
Guelph, ON N1G 2W1
Phone: 519-824-4120 Ext. 2508
FAX: 519 763-8933