call for comments, referrals, citations, etc

john vickery (JVICKERY@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU)
Wed, 13 Jul 94 23:41:39 EDT

Greetings SANETers. This is a call for comments, referrals, citations, etc.

I refer you to the article by Taylor, Donald C., et al. 1993: Creating a farmer
sustainability
index: a Malaysian case study. Am. J. of Alternative Agriculture. 8(4):175-184.

The published abstract:

In on-farm studies of sustainable agriculture, farmers often have been
classified
as sustainable according to their organizational affilitation;
self-identification; or
use or non-use of a particular production practice or input, usually
synthetic
chemicals. Because this is a great oversimplification, researchers
recently have
been incorporating several dimensions of sustainability into a composite
measure. Typically this is a relative measure of sustainability, with
scores
assigned by comparing individual farmers' practices to those used by all
farmers. In contrast, in the farmer sustanbility indes (FSI) presented
here,
practices are scored according to their inherent sustainability. We
report on the
development of an FSI in a case study involving 33 production practices
used
by 85 cabbage farmers in Malaysia. We describe its underlying
principles, the
procedure and rationale for scoring each sustainability item, and the
result of
combining the constituent items into a composite index.

Additional characterization:

The FSI is a crop-specific assessment questionnaire focusing on variables that
are
largely farmer-controlled, namely, management systems or cultural practices.
The
questionnaire items--the FSI variables--are designed to characterize farming
practices
such as chemical inputs, tillage practices, crop rotation or intercropping
practices, etc.
Responses to questionnaire items--the "outputs"--are assigned scores according
to a
calibration that is normative in reference to productivity, efficiency,
conservation, and
effects on environmental and human health, within the paradigmatic framework of
sustainability. The selection of questionnaire items as well as the calibration
of their
respective outputs reflects ecogregional variations and accomodates the
programmatic
goals of user entitites.

Practical applications The FSI could be useful to:

1) to extension specialists in making recommendations to farmers
regarding
management practices
2) to researchers in characterizing current local or indigenous
practices; 3) to
extension agencies in planning programmatic efforts
4) to agricultural educators in modifying curricula to appropriately
address
current but common unsustainable practices.
5) to extensionists and researchers to characterize trends in farm
management
practices
6) extension agents in evaluating the outcome of programmatic
interventions in
agricultural and other land management practices .
7) to researchers in developing new recommendations, technologies, and
methods where current recommendations or alternatives vis-a-vis sustainability
are
inadequate or impractical or undesirable from the farmer's point of view

Observation:

It could be argued that, in some ways, assessments that characterizes a farmer
or
producer's management or cultural practices are the most "direct", practical,
and
useful approaches. This is because such assessments:

 concern variables that can be directly changed or improved by choice
and
planning--the farmer or land manager's decisions
 do not require expensive equipment, considerable time or effort, nor
much
training to collect data

Current Context:

I am exploring the possibility of constructing and administering an FSI here in
Georgia
as my masters thesis project. I am making contacts in the relevant state and
federal
agricultural extension agencies to determine the extent of interest, to identify
potential
collaborators or reviewers, to foster official adoption, etc. Likely crops are
cotton,
peanuts, and soybeans.

I would appreciate referrals to: any similar efforts in other states, within
USDA, etc.;
relevant grey literature; comodity associations and other NGO's (domestic or
international) as well as funding entities that might be interested, etc.

Much obliged.
Cordially, John

John Vickery/Institute of Ecology/UGA/Athens, GA 30602
Institute's main office number: 706-542-2968; 542-6040 (FAX)
JVICKERY@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU