Monday, January 10, 2000, 7:38:27 AM, you wrote:
DW> Chuck is using deliberately inflammatory language here.
Evidently in response to the following.:
DW> Chuck wrote:
>>> IATP, SEHN, and CPI/CU announce the availability of comments
>>> submitted Jan 7, 2000 to the EUP on the Monsanto application for
>>> an Experimental Use Permit for Cry3Bb transgenic corn, engineered
>>> to emit Bt through roots and root exudates
I sometimes wish Chuck *were* more inflammatory, passionate,
aggressive etc. However, I know he is *right* in being as cautious,
reserved, measured, reflective, consistent, congruent and disciplined
as he always is whenever making a remark in public - but that can only
be expected from an ex-head of the Board on Agriculture of the
National Research Council, and I certainly can't question either the
depth of his commitment or the the scope of his knowledge.
The one who flies off the handle and makes remarks not sustained in
fact is Dale. Chuck is probably the best example you'll get of what
you need to do be taken more seriously. (This is not to say that you
don't occasionally contribute something of value).
To Unsubscribe: Email firstname.lastname@example.org with the command
"unsubscribe sanet-mg". If you receive the digest format, use the command
To Subscribe to Digest: Email email@example.com with the command
All messages to sanet-mg are archived at:
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Feb 06 2000 - 12:00:19 EST