RE: Ag Subsidies (was French farmers)

Harris, Craig (Craig.Harris@ssc.msu.edu)
Tue, 26 Oct 1999 20:19:19 -0400

just for perspective, in recent years government payments have constituted
between 40 and 50 percent of net farm income in the united states
craig

craig k harris
department of sociology
michigan state university
429b berkey hall
east lansing michigan 48824-1111
tel: 517-355-5048
fax: 517-432-2856

> ----------
> From: Hal Hamilton[SMTP:hhamilton@centerss.org]
> Sent: Tuesday 26 October 1999 12:22 PM
> To: Bluestem Associates; sanet-mg@ces.ncsu.edu
> Subject: RE: Ag Subsidies (was French farmers)
>
> Bart wrote:
>
> "My core belief, however, is that subsidies distort the agri-food
> economy to the degree that sustainability becomes vastly more elusive."
>
> Hal asks: Although you can demonstrate that subsidies provide incentives
> for
> decisions by producers that may be different from incentives provided
> solely
> by the market, what is your evidence that market incentives yield
> sustainability? My assumption is that market incentives lead to
> externalizing costs whenever possible. If I can produce more corn by
> dozing
> the fencerows, I'll do it, and let the birds nest somewhere else.
>
> Hal Hamilton wrote:
>
> >I hate to acknowledge it, but the Swiss and French Jura, where some of
> the
> >best cheese in the world is made, would be depopulated without subsidies.
>
> Bart wrote: If the demand for such local high quality food is *real*, it
> will be
> reflected in prices. If it is sustainable, subsidies will be
> unnecessary.
>
> Hal answers: I'm talking about Swiss Gruyere and French Compte. The
> demand
> is real. The prices are relatively high. Industry is pressuring the
> farmers to increase production to meet increasing demand. The farmer
> coops
> are resisting this pressure because their mental model of success is
> something like "adequacy" instead of "continual growth." Quite
> extraordinary, really. And that's why the Jura mountains are such a
> wonderful region for tourists, hikers, bicyclists, etc.. It's beautiful.
> But, unfortunately, the market return to the farmers, even with a premium
> product, does not support a middle class lifestyle with modest scale
> production. So there are subsidies for young farmers (something like
> $50,000 grant to get started or buy out the parents), subsidies for
> producing in the mountains, so the landscape is protected, and so forth.
> My
> rough estimate is that something like 30-40 percent of net farm income
> comes
> from subsidies. Is this wrong? Our society subsidizes education, highway
> construction, health care, military defense, rural development, recreation
> in parks, and so on. Why not farming in regions that would otherwise be
> depopulated? I wish it didn't appear to be necessary, and I agree that
> the
> contract should be clear--internalize costs, no dumping, protect
> biodiversity, water quality, etc..
>
> Hal
>
> Hal Hamilton
> Center for Sustainable Systems
> 433 Chestnut St., Berea KY 40403 USA
> Phone: (606) 986-5336; Fax: (606) 986-1299
> hhamilton@centerss.org
>
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: Email majordomo@ces.ncsu.edu with the command
> "unsubscribe sanet-mg". If you receive the digest format, use the command
> "unsubscribe sanet-mg-digest".
> To Subscribe to Digest: Email majordomo@ces.ncsu.edu with the command
> "subscribe sanet-mg-digest".
>
> All messages to sanet-mg are archived at:
> http://www.sare.org/htdocs/hypermail
>

To Unsubscribe: Email majordomo@ces.ncsu.edu with the command
"unsubscribe sanet-mg". If you receive the digest format, use the command
"unsubscribe sanet-mg-digest".
To Subscribe to Digest: Email majordomo@ces.ncsu.edu with the command
"subscribe sanet-mg-digest".

All messages to sanet-mg are archived at:
http://www.sare.org/htdocs/hypermail