Re: another genetic eng. article

Dan Hook (guldann@ix.netcom.com)
Tue, 17 Aug 1999 11:33:31 -0400

>Hi group, the below article brings up a few questions of which you folks
may have some info. I find it humerous that Avery "uses" an ecological
theme; rainforest etc. to defend the use of the highly unecological use of
GM plus conventional farming methods. He argues The future wold will need
more food which means additional land plowed up to produce more food. Well
question in the big picture, if we "froze" the quantity of farm land we now
have in production world wide and used sustainable ag. methods, could
production increase? Increase enough to handle the "speculated" population
increase?
Say everyone believed Avery and used his methods would production increase,
would the rainforest be safe? Would drinking water, soil etc be safe?
Thank-you list Beth

Biotechnology in agriculture is the key to having our cake
>and rain forests too
>
>>snip
>The Europeans are considering a total ban on the use of
>antibiotics in animal feed on grounds that antibiotic residues
>may contribute to the growth of so-called superbugs that "use"
>low doses to become resistant. In fact, the Wall Street Journal
>reported that "EU officials concede that they lack clear
>scientific evidence to link the use of antibiotics in animal feed
>to growing antibiotic resistance in humans." Nevertheless the
>officials invoke a "precautionary principle" to give enormous
>benefit to any doubt in these cases. Productivity in agriculture
>is the cost.
>
>Dennis Avery of the Hudson Institute argues in the July issue of
>World Link Magazine that "neither population growth, urban sprawl
>nor global warming pose nearly as great a threat to the world's
>wildlands as the energetic plows of the low-yield farmers . . .
>Without the higher crop yields achieved with hybrid seeds,
>chemical fertilizers, irrigation and modern pest control, the
>world would already have plowed another 40 million square
>kilometres of wildlands to produce today's food supply." GM foods
>must be the source of another revolution in agricultural
>productivity if we are to prevent the loss of vastly more natural
>land.
>
>Fear of new technology fed by low-productivity agricultural
>interests operating behind high trade barriers threatens not only
>the supply, quality and affordability of food in coming years,
>but the global environment. It is not enough to decry public
>opposition to genetically altered foods and related innovations;
>rational doubts require convincing assurances from public and
>private authorities lest the growing power of science be sadly
>hobbled in expanding fields.
>
>To Unsubscribe: Email majordomo@ces.ncsu.edu with the command
>"unsubscribe sanet-mg". If you receive the digest format, use the command
>"unsubscribe sanet-mg-digest".
>To Subscribe to Digest: Email majordomo@ces.ncsu.edu with the command
>"subscribe sanet-mg-digest".
>
>All messages to sanet-mg are archived at:
>http://www.sare.org/htdocs/hypermail

To Unsubscribe: Email majordomo@ces.ncsu.edu with the command
"unsubscribe sanet-mg". If you receive the digest format, use the command
"unsubscribe sanet-mg-digest".
To Subscribe to Digest: Email majordomo@ces.ncsu.edu with the command
"subscribe sanet-mg-digest".

All messages to sanet-mg are archived at:
http://www.sare.org/htdocs/hypermail