I read the report and found it lucid, balanced, and well-documented.
> Who is ACSH?
The ACSH board is mainly scientists and physicians. I took a random sample
of about twenty of the 250 ACSH board members and looked up their
publications. More than half have published extensively in peer-reviewed
journals, and appear to be productive scientists.
> In many of these cases, investigative journalists have already
> exposed direct connections between ACSH and its funders.
Could you be more specific?
> But in almost every instance, it takes little effort to discover
> which funder has a vested interest in supporting ACSH¹s message.
That doesn't mean their findings are wrong.
> Re-arrange the letters, just as ASCH has re-arranged findings
> in published studies, and you find ''CASH'' funded by vested
What part of the report do you disagree with?
To Unsubscribe: Email email@example.com with the command
"unsubscribe sanet-mg". If you receive the digest format, use the command
To Subscribe to Digest: Email firstname.lastname@example.org with the command
All messages to sanet-mg are archived at: