Re: Hogs? Farming ? and a rerun ?

Pat Elazar (Pat_Elazar@cwb.ca)
Wed, 16 Dec 1998 11:03:02 -0600

<there was an article in the local paper which indicated that the
differential pricing between retail and the farm was due to the fact
that shackle space was at its limits. Thus packers can't meet demand at
the retail and can charge based on this demand. On the other hand, more
pigs at the head of the line means the packers can force their raw
materials down in price...

Hmmm, is this a conspiracy- the packers control the marikets and the
price of the hogs--- seems that some producers would get smart and find
a way around the bottleneck-- pretty hard with no capital and then
having to go to new, high cost production, when the big processors can
undercut-
Have farmers been here before? Is this a rerun?

thoughts?>

Its not a conspiracy even though it may be an undesirable situation.
Why should supermarkets charge less for pork if consumers will pay more?
Why should packers pay more if hogs are still driving up the driveway at
$0.16?

This scenario militates toward more vertical integration since both the
retailer & packer are making money. When producers sell directly to
consumers that is precisely what they are doing (even if they don't realise
it). Most family farm operations are financed with equity or debt capital.
Perhaps a CSA for meat could attract "venture" type capital for expansion
or neccesary upgrading of facilities & breeding stocks?

To Unsubscribe: Email majordomo@ces.ncsu.edu with the command
"unsubscribe sanet-mg".
To Subscribe to Digest: Email majordomo@ces.ncsu.edu with the command
"subscribe sanet-mg-digest".

All messages to sanet-mg are archived at:
http://www.sare.org/htdocs/hypermail