RE: compost vs. residue

Ronald Nigh (danamex@mail.internet.com.mx)
Mon, 28 Sep 1998 15:39:57 -0500

Dale wrote:
>it occurred to me that the issue of in-situ decomposition versus
>composting, really hinges on the purpose of the organic matter addition. If
>one is using exogenous organic matter as the main source of plant nutrients,
>then you almost have to use compost, because of the lower carbon:nitrogen
>

The interesting thing about the research I mentioned from Argentaina and
Brazil is that they found that in situ decomposition of celulose not only
was better for improving crumb structure through the release of colloids,
but, under proper conditions, also served as a substrate for free-living
N-fixing organisms to supply enough N to sustain high crop yields. On the
other hand, high-N inputs, be it compost, raw chicken manure or synthetic
urea, inhibits such natural N-fixation.

It seems to me that the challenge to fertility managment is to get the N
from the air--cheap and energy efficient. This would suggest that we would
what compost with a high C:N ratio but perhaps with other ccharacteristics
that stimulate the soil food web.

Ronald Nigh
Dana, A.C.
Mexico, D.F. & San Cristóbal de Las Casas, Chiapas
Tel. y FAX 525-666-73-66 (DF)
529-678-72-15 (Chiapas)
danamex@mail.internet.com.mx

To Unsubscribe: Email majordomo@ces.ncsu.edu with "unsubscribe sanet-mg".
To Subscribe to Digest: Email majordomo@ces.ncsu.edu with the command
"subscribe sanet-mg-digest".