Inequality is a problem. If sustainable economics would distribute wealth
and income more happily, how might it supplant the system we've got? If it
has to be dynamic in order to replace the current economic system, how
could it become static afterward in order to be sustainable?
At 08:07 AM 9/4/98 -0400, Frederick R. Magdoff wrote:
>Bill,
> I enjoyed your comments about capitalism and think your summary is
interesting........ But another important aspect is that the system
produces striking inequality among people............. the inequality
reaches unconscionable levels. A sustainable economic system would strive
to decrease the inequaltites of wealth and income
>***************************************************************************
***
On Fri, 4 Sep 1998, BILL DUESING wrote:
>> Living on the Earth. September 4, 1998: Real Work
>>
>> For most of our history, humans have had to work in order to live. For
the vast majority of that time, the work was varied.......... In this
century, work has become increasingly abstract........This economic system
won't lead us to a sustainable future because it has gone so far beyond
supplying our basic needs. Now, its basic need is for ever-more growth,
and finding consumers for increasingly enormous quantities of low-cost,
subsidized goods that pour off the production lines all over the world.
Jim Quinton
Agricultural Conservation Innovation Center (ACIC)
2234 S. Hobson Ave.
Charleston, SC 29405-2413
phone: (843) 740-1327
fax: (843) 740-1331
e-mail: Jim.Quinton@agconserv.com
To Unsubscribe: Email majordomo@ces.ncsu.edu with "unsubscribe sanet-mg".
To Subscribe to Digest: Email majordomo@ces.ncsu.edu with the command
"subscribe sanet-mg-digest".