Re: Fwd: Enviro-Newsbrief 5/27/98 -Reply

Sal (sals@rain.org)
Thu, 28 May 1998 11:12:44 -0700

I disagree . I think people feel organic food is safer. I feel if we growers
are going to have to carry the cross we should also get the crown. I say go
for the product quality claim that Organic food is safer and let us cut to
the
chase. let us quit stalling and cut to the chase. What certifiers feel
organic
food is not safer? What inspectors feel organic food is not safer. I want to
hear why? .
. the organic grower is being asked to carrying the cross of government
organic
Gestapo and bureaucratic paper work forced fees forced inspections forced
certification and forced residue test just to be able to use that word organic
and a big part of that word is "More safe" . Organic growing is safer for the
farm worker the grower out air ,water,children the earth etc. . .

After all that bs I want to be able to say most organic food is safer than
most
food grown with harmful chemicals for man and the earth. . Do you think
organic
food is safer? That should be the frist question? That is what folks have
been
lead to feel. Is is safer. I feel 200000 have already voted. Do you want
to be counted in that number. customers buy organic food because they feel it
is safer bottom line. you can dance around it all you want that is the bottom
line a lot of folks feel organic food is safer for them and their children.
what do you think if you are going to make organic growers carry the cross
give them the crown. look here if organic food has to have only 10% of the
pesticides as the EPA allows for conventional food in residue tests and will
probably be tested 100 %more often . than conventional food and imported
food
than that part of the law alone make it 90 per cent safer. how can you
say it
is not safer?
.you cannot force organic growers to carry the cross and you can not take away
our crown. give organic back to the people. keep organic free of politics.

politics taken from the Latin word polly meaning more and ticks meaning
bloodsuckers.

At 09:05 AM 5/28/98 -0400, Grace J Gershuny wrote:
>Dear Sanetters,
>
>The issue of whether organic food is safer than conventional food is one
>for consumers to decide, based on reliable information about how the
>food was produced.  The key point here is that the organic label refers to
>a production process, not a product quality claim.  This is totally
>consistent with the evolution of the organic certification system that now
>exists, and efforts by the Organic Trade Association and others to
>educate consumers to understand that organic production methods
>cannot guarantee that there will be no residues in a product.  
>
>The development of a marketing program within USDA that is about the
>production process rather than product grades is a major advance. 
>Who among you would endorse a program that directly repudiated the
>value of the rest of what you were doing?
>
>Grace Gershuny
>USDA National Organic Program Staff
>
>
>To Unsubscribe:  Email majordomo@ces.ncsu.edu with "unsubscribe sanet-mg".
>To Subscribe to Digest: Email majordomo@ces.ncsu.edu with the command
>"subscribe sanet-mg-digest".
>
Sals@rain.org
check out an organic growers homepage at:
<http://www.rain.org/~sals/my.html>http://www.rain.org/~sals/my.html

To Unsubscribe: Email majordomo@ces.ncsu.edu with "unsubscribe sanet-mg".
To Subscribe to Digest: Email majordomo@ces.ncsu.edu with the command
"subscribe sanet-mg-digest".