Re: Come together

Amy Knutson (aknutson@peak.org)
Thu, 21 May 1998 09:29:09 -0700 (PDT)

Why not take the original consensus of standards put together by the
National Organic Standards Board, change some of the wording and reissue
them as a different certification as you describe? That way, farmers and
producers won't be breaking the law after USDA does their stuff and the
rest of us will know which standard actually has meaning for consumers.
-Amy K.

On Wed, 20 May 1998, sal wrote:

> Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 16:53:43 -0700
> From: sal <sals@rain.org>
> To: organic-certification@listserv.oit.unc.edu,
> organic-certification@listserv.oit.unc.edu,
> Organic Gardening Discussion List <OGL@LSV.UKY.EDU>,
> Multiple recipients of list OGL <OGL@LSV.UKY.EDU>,
> sanet-mg@shasta.ces.ncsu.edu
> Subject: Come together
>
> "Not just organic -- community certified"
>
>
>
> The response to the USDA's proposed rules for organic has been loud and
> critical. The government's decision to include among other things genetically
> engineered organisms, sewage sludge, factory farming of livestock, and
> irradiated foods under the organic umbrella ranked farmers and consumers
> alike. It now appears almost certain that the rules will be rewritten, thus
> adding more time and frustration to what has already been a lengthy and
> confusing process.
>
> Some of us who have farmed for years chemical free are convinced that asking
> the USDA to define organic is like trusting the Fox to guard the chicken
> coop.
> Rather than waiting on the government "or anyone else" we are instead
> suggesting a proactive stance. Since last October we have been meeting
> monthly
> to discuss what shape appropriate local response to the debate on organic
> might
> take. Weather third party certified organic or biodynamic or independently
> organic we all agree that are most trusted and recognizable support comes from
> our customers. We also saw eye to eye on matters such as protecting customers
> right to choose, educating the public on the benefits of chemical free
> farming,
> in connecting customers to sources of food as Hallmark of good, safe and
> sustainable agriculture.
>
> Washington cannot address these matters for us, nor can they define the values
> they reflect, since they are spiritual values and depend on a system of
> regulation that exceeds any government's capacity to legislate. Instead, we
> need what we begun to call "community certification." Community certification
> is carried out by individuals who look at each other in the eye at farmers
> markets, in community programs, and produce stance. It is based on honor and
> trust, and no federal program will ever match its integrity.
>
> We recognize the years of combin agricultural experience represented among
> you,
> and we need your participation as we clarify what this new "system" should
> looked like. We are considering a new certification program tentatively
> called
> "community certified" which would not used word organic at all. Please
> join us
> in further discussion.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> An organic growers homepage check out
>
> http://www.rain.org/~sals/my.html
>
> To Unsubscribe: Email majordomo@ces.ncsu.edu with "unsubscribe sanet-mg".
> To Subscribe to Digest: Email majordomo@ces.ncsu.edu with the command
> "subscribe sanet-mg-digest".
>

The Growing EDGE
P.O. Box 1027
341 S.W. 2nd Street
Corvallis, OR 97333
Website -- http://www.growingedge.com

To Unsubscribe: Email majordomo@ces.ncsu.edu with "unsubscribe sanet-mg".
To Subscribe to Digest: Email majordomo@ces.ncsu.edu with the command
"subscribe sanet-mg-digest".