The Higher Organic Standards Issue -Reply

Grace J Gershuny (Grace_J.Gershuny@usda.gov)
Wed, 25 Mar 1998 22:21:00 -0500

Insofar as I could follow the various arguments given here, it seems as
though Eric has it right. Right now, certifiers can and sometimes do
verify specific production practices requested by particular
manufacturers, and there is nothing in the OFPA or the proposed rule to
prevent them from continuing to do so. There is no implication of
anybody needing to construct a whole new set of standards--there
would still be one standard for organic. Nobody would be required to do
such additional verification--it's just an option that some might use.

One scenario that was presented at the recent NOSB meeting was an
objection, from a consumer's point of view, to using a certification seal
as a marketing tool. The OFPA establishes certification as the means of
allowing a product to legally enter the organic marketplace. How it is
promoted once it gets there should not be the province of a certification
agency.

An organization that wanted to promote its members products as meeting
whatever standard they chose (such as fair trade practices, or
adherence to a particular spiritually derived methodology) could do so. It
could also label its members' products as organic as long as they also
complied with the OFPA and the regulations. If this organization were
also certifying that its members were adhering to its standards, it could
be seen as a conflict of interest, since the functions of verification and
promotion are merged in one organization.

I hope this helps shed some light...

Grace Gershuny
USDA National Organic Program Staff


>>> owner-sanet-mg@ces.ncsu.edu@i 03/26/98 08:37am >>>
[Text body exceeds maximum size of message body (8192 bytes). It has
been converted to attachment.]

To Unsubscribe: Email majordomo@ces.ncsu.edu with "unsubscribe sanet-mg".
To Subscribe to Digest: Email majordomo@ces.ncsu.edu with the command
"subscribe sanet-mg-digest".