Fwd: PANUPS: Unsafe Pesticides on Food

sal (sals@rain.org)
Sat, 31 Jan 1998 06:48:07 -0800

And what does the USDA do to help out. Tax and burden organic growers! Charge
the organic growers a fee for not using these harmful chemicals. They got it
backword.
What is wrong with the USDA can't they see the forest from the trees. Those
that trust the USDA EPA etc are getting unsafe pesticides in their food and
their kids food. Keep the USDA far away from the organic farmer and we will
all be better off. Make them get their own house in order. Get the fox
out of
the hen house!!!! Organic growers should not have to spend one cent extra to
grow and sell organic!!!!

>Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 15:41:47 -0800 (PST)
>X-Conference: panna.panups
>X-Conference: panna.panups
>From: panupdates@igc.apc.org
>Subject: PANUPS: Unsafe Pesticides on Food
>To: Recipients of conference <panups@igc.apc.org>
>X-Gateway: conf2mail@igc.apc.org
>Lines: 130
>Sender: owner-sanet-mg@ces.ncsu.edu
>
>            =====================================
>                         P A N U P S
>                             ***
>                   Pesticide Action Network
>                        North America
>                       Updates Service
>                 <http://www.panna.org/panna/>http://www.panna.org/panna/
>                   email panna@panna.org
>            =====================================
>
>January 30, 1998
>
>U.S. EPA Fails to Protect Children from Pesticides in Food
>
>Every day, one million U.S. children age five and under
>consume unsafe levels of pesticides that can harm the
>developing brain and nervous system, according to a new
>report by the Environmental Working Group (EWG). The report,
>based on an analysis of federal data, found that most of the
>risk to children comes from five organophosphate
>insecticides: methyl parathion, dimethoate, chlorpyrifos,
>pirimiphos methyl and azinphos methyl. The foods most likely
>to contain unsafe levels are peaches, apples, nectarines,
>popcorn and pears. Among baby foods, pears, peaches and apple
>juice most frequently had elevated levels.
>
>EWG undertook the study to monitor effectiveness of the 1996
>Food Quality Protection Act, which requires all pesticides to
>be safe for infants and children. "It's been more than 18
>months since Congress passed the Food Quality Protection
>Act," said Richard Wiles, vice president for research at the
>Environmental Working Group. "This study shows that every
>day, hundreds of thousands of children receive unsafe
>exposures, at precisely the age when they are most vulnerable
>to long- and short-term brain and nervous system damage." The
>study found that approximately one in four peaches and one in
>eight apples have levels of organophosphate insecticides
>(OPs) that are unsafe for children.
>
>The report stresses that the solution is not for infants and
>children to eat fewer fruits and vegetables, but rather "that
>baby food should not contain pesticides," said Wiles
>
>EWG says its report is the first comprehensive analysis of
>exposure to organophosphate pesticides in the U.S. food
>supply. It is based on more than 80,000 samples of food
>tested by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the
>Food and Drug Administration, and dietary records for more
>than 4,000 children collected by USDA.
>
>According to the report, estimates of the number of children
>at risk of exposure to unsafe levels of pesticides are
>conservative because children are also exposed to pesticides
>sprayed in their homes, schools and day care centers. In
>addition, the EPA's current standards are based on levels
>considered safe for adults. The study estimates that as many
>as 3.6 million children aged 6 months to 5 years would be
>considered at risk from pesticide levels in food if EPA set
>standards that complied with the Food Quality Protection Act,
>which requires an additional ten-fold margin of safety.
>
>EWG urges that the five OP pesticides be banned immediately
>for all agricultural use, and also recommends:
>-- a ban on all home and other structural use of OP
>pesticides
>-- a ban on all OP pesticides on commodities that end up in
>baby food
>-- safety standards for all OP pesticides must be set at
>levels that are safe for infants and children
>-- additional developmental neurotoxicity studies on all OP
>pesticides in the food supply must be conducted before EPA
>adopts new OP regulations next year.
>
>The chemical and food industries called the report alarmist
>and said it serves only to frighten parents away from
>wholesome food. "The food is safe and so are their children,"
>said Jay Vroom, president of the American Crop Protection
>Association.
>
>But EPA has already identified organophosphates as the top
>priority in determining whether to change the acceptable
>residue levels in food. EPA will decide whether to set new
>standards for organophosphates in the food supply by August
>1999. The agency could ban them outright or change the
>acceptable levels in foods. According to an Associated Press
>report, one top EPA official familiar with the Environmental
>Working Group report said its findings were not out of line
>with the agency's analysis of the threat to children.
>
>"The study offers concrete evidence reinforcing our view that
>organophosphates cannot be safely used on food," said David
>Chatfield, Executive Director of Californians for Pesticide
>Reform (CPR), a coalition of over 70 groups in California.
>"The report shows how widespread these contaminants are and
>calls into serious question the notion that children's safety
>can be ensured by setting allowable, so-called 'safe
>exposure' limits. These chemicals are unsafe at any speed,
>and should be banned."
>
>Copies of the report can be ordered for US$20 from EWG (see
>below) or downloaded from the internet: <http://www.ewg.org/>www.ewg.org.
>
>Sources: "Overexposed: Organophosphate Insecticides in
>Children's Food," 1998. Environmental Working Group;
>Associated Press, January 29, 1998.
>
>Contacts: EWG, 1718 Connecticut Ave, N.W., Suite 600,
>Washington, DC 20009; phone (202) 667-6982; fax (202) 232-
>2592; email info@ewg.org; web site: <http://www.ewg.org/>www.ewg.org
>CPR, 116 New Montgomery, #800, San Francisco, CA 94105; phone
>(415) 495-1149; fax (415) 495-1141; email pests@igc.org; web
>site: <http://www.igc.org/cpr>www.igc.org/cpr.
>
>===========================================================
>
>Pesticide Action Network North America (PANNA)
>116 New Montgomery, #810, San Francisco, CA 94105
>Phone:(415) 541-9140
>Fax:(415) 541-9253
>Email: panna@panna.org 
><mailto:panna@panna.org>mailto:panna@panna.org
>(only some emailers use above command)
><http://www.panna.org/panna/>http://www.panna.org/panna/
>
>To subscribe to PANUPS, email to MAJORDOMO@igc.apc.org with
>the following text on one line: subscribe panups
>To unsubscribe send the following: unsubscribe panups 
>
>===========================================================

>
>To Unsubscribe:  Email majordomo@ces.ncsu.edu with "unsubscribe sanet-mg".
>To Subscribe to Digest: Email majordomo@ces.ncsu.edu with the command
>"subscribe sanet-mg-digest".
>
An organic growers homepage check out

http://www.rain.org/~sals/my.html

To Unsubscribe: Email majordomo@ces.ncsu.edu with "unsubscribe sanet-mg".
To Subscribe to Digest: Email majordomo@ces.ncsu.edu with the command
"subscribe sanet-mg-digest".