Re: hybridization vs. genetic engineering

ec Roberts (ecr@ivic.net)
Thu, 24 Jul 97 17:00:56 PDT

Mr. Worley,
In following a similar thread in some newsgroups, I have not seen any=
cite specifying which, if any plant genes were spliced with animal dna =
and subsequently "released" into the biosphere. Can you help us out by =
naming the specific plants which were genetically altered with animal dna=
and released?
Thank you.
Bob
ec Roberts
**** ecr@ivic.net ****
**** www.ivic.net/~ecr ****
**** Armed and Safe (tm) ****
**** armed_and_safe@technologist.com ****

----------
>
>
> On Tue, 22 Jul 1997 17:47:37 -0500 "S. Rae Schnapp & Jeff Smith" wrote =
in
> reply to Karen Mundy <karenm@vt.edu>
> >
> >There is a good reason why you are confused.
{snip}
>
> There is one BIG difference between the two as I understand it Dr.
> Scnapp. Traditional plant breeders have never been able to splice a =
gene
> from a fish or animal, or even a microbe, into one of their hybrids. =

> Those using biotechnological Genetic Engineering techniques can and =
have
> done just that.
>
> Then, due to the laxness of the regulations and the relaxed attitudes
> of the USDA officials, these new recombinant type hybrids have been
> released with little or no testing. Not only that, but they have ben
> forced upon all of us by the decision to NOT require labeling. And in
> some instances, attempts to get labeling have been thwarted by those =
same
> officials and the courts such that labeling has been declared illegal.
>
> In my opinion, such actions are criminal!
>
>
> --Dan in Sunny Puerto Rico--
> DAN.WORLEY@JUNO.COM or
> DAN.WORLEY@GENIE.COM
>

*****************